Temp Mail Logo

Temp Mail safeguards your privacy while keeping your inbox free from spam.

⟷ Line-by-Line · LCS Algorithm · Split + Unified · Code + Docs

Text Diff Checker

Free online text diff checker -- compare two texts side by side and instantly see which lines were added, removed, or unchanged. Uses the same LCS algorithm as Git and Unix diff. Works for code, config files, documents, and any plain text. 100% client-side, no signup required.

✓ LCS algorithm✓ Split + unified views✓ Line stats✓ Code + docs✓ 100% client-side
Original (Left)
Modified (Right)
What this tool does

Free text diff checker -- compare two texts online with line-by-line difference highlighting for code, documents, and config files

How the LCS diff algorithm works, what the split and unified views show, and when to use a text comparison tool

This free online text diff checker compares two pieces of text at the line level and produces a colour-coded output showing exactly what changed between them. The comparison uses the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) algorithm implemented as a dynamic programming solution with an O(n*m) table -- the same foundational algorithm used by the Unix diff command, GNU diff, and Git version control. LCS finds the largest set of lines that appear in the same relative order in both texts without requiring them to be contiguous. Lines that belong to this common set are classified as unchanged (equal) and displayed without highlighting. Lines present in the left/original text but absent from the right/modified text are classified as removed and displayed in red. Lines present in the right/modified text but absent from the left/original text are classified as added and displayed in green. The entire algorithm runs client-side in your browser -- no text is ever transmitted to any server.

The tool offers two display modes switchable via the toolbar. Unified view displays all lines in a single scrollable column, with removed lines prefixed by a red minus and added lines prefixed by a green plus. Unchanged lines appear without a prefix in the default text colour. This is the format used by git diff in the terminal and is most compact for reading when changes are scattered throughout a long document. Split view displays the original text in the left column and the modified text in the right column simultaneously. The left column shows only original and unchanged lines (removed lines visible, added lines hidden), and the right column shows only modified and unchanged lines (added lines visible, removed lines hidden). This format makes it easy to see exactly what one block of text was replaced with when larger sections have been rewritten. The stats bar shows a summary count of added, removed, and unchanged lines after every comparison.

The most common use cases for this text diff checker span development, writing, and document management. For developers, the primary uses are: reviewing changes between two versions of a code file before committing, comparing configuration files between environments (development vs staging vs production), verifying that a generated file matches an expected output, and auditing database migration scripts between versions. For writers and content teams, the key uses are: comparing two drafts of an article to see what was edited, verifying that a translated document preserves the structural integrity of the original, and proofreading legal or contractual documents where subtle wording changes have significant implications. For SEO and marketing, diff tools are used to track changes between page content versions and verify that content updates were applied correctly. The tool handles any plain text input including code in any language, Markdown, HTML, CSV, JSON, YAML, and prose documents.

Features and details
LCS Algorithm
Longest Common Subsequence dynamic programming -- the same approach used by Unix diff and Git for minimal change detection.
Unified View
Single-stream output with + and - prefixes showing additions and removals interleaved with unchanged context lines.
Split View
Side-by-side columns showing original on the left and modified on the right for easy visual comparison of replaced blocks.
Line Stats
Counts of added, removed, and unchanged lines displayed after every comparison for a quick change-magnitude summary.
Colour Coding
Green highlighting for added lines, red for removed lines, and transparent background for unchanged lines throughout both views.
Code Support
Works for any programming language, config format, or plain text -- comparison is language-agnostic and purely line-level.
Sample Button
Loads a JavaScript function comparison instantly to demonstrate the diff output format before entering your own content.
Dark Monospace Output
JetBrains Mono font in a dark #1e1e2e themed panel for comfortable reading of code and technical content in the diff output.
Client-Side Only
Zero server requests -- the LCS algorithm executes entirely in your browser, making the tool safe for sensitive or confidential text.
No Signup Required
Run unlimited comparisons with no account, no API key, no rate limiting, and no data collection of any kind.
Examples

Text diff examples -- code review, document revision, config comparison, legal contracts, and identical text verification

Five real-world scenarios showing what diff output looks like and how to interpret added, removed, and unchanged line counts
ExcellentCode review -- function signature updated, return value changed
Original (left): Modified (right): function greet(name) { function greet(name, greeting) { - console.log("Hello, " + name); + console.log(greeting + name); - return true; + return name; } } Stats: 2 removed, 2 added, 3 unchanged
A typical code review diff showing a function signature change and two internal line modifications. The LCS algorithm correctly identifies the unchanged opening brace and closing brace as equal lines, making the two changed lines stand out clearly. This is the most common use case for developers comparing code before and after a refactor.
GoodDocument revision -- paragraph rewritten, section added
Original: Modified: Introduction Introduction - Our product helps teams work. + Our product helps remote teams + collaborate faster and ship more. Key features: Key features: - Fast - Fast - Reliable - Reliable + - Scalable Stats: 1 removed, 3 added, 5 unchanged
A marketing document revision showing a rewritten introductory sentence (one removal, two additions replacing it) and a new bullet point added to the feature list. The split view makes it immediately clear which paragraph was expanded. This use case is common for content teams comparing draft versions before publishing.
GoodConfig file comparison -- environment variable updated
Original (.env.staging): Modified (.env.production): NODE_ENV=staging NODE_ENV=production - API_URL=https://staging.api.io + API_URL=https://api.io - DEBUG=true + DEBUG=false PORT=3000 PORT=3000 - LOG_LEVEL=verbose + LOG_LEVEL=error Stats: 3 removed, 3 added, 2 unchanged
Comparing a staging environment config file against the production version reveals exactly which variables differ. Three lines changed (API URL, debug flag, log level) while two lines (NODE_ENV label and PORT) stayed the same. This type of config diff is essential before deploying to prevent accidentally carrying over debug settings.
GoodLegal document -- clause updated between contract versions
Original (v1): Modified (v2): 1. Payment Terms 1. Payment Terms - Payment is due within 30 days. + Payment is due within 14 days. Late fees apply after due date. Late fees apply after due date. 2. Termination 2. Termination - Either party may terminate + Client may terminate with - with 60 days written notice. + 30 days written notice. Stats: 3 removed, 3 added, 3 unchanged
Contract revisions often involve subtle but legally significant changes. The diff immediately surfaces the payment term shortening from 30 to 14 days and the termination clause change from mutual to client-only with a halved notice period. Catching these changes visually in a diff is much more reliable than manually reading two versions of a long document.
GoodIdentical texts -- confirming no changes were introduced
Original: Modified (after copy-paste): Hello world Hello world This is a test This is a test Line three here Line three here Stats: 0 removed, 0 added, 3 unchanged Result: Texts are identical
Running a diff on two supposedly identical texts and seeing zero added and zero removed lines confirms they are byte-for-byte identical at the line level. This is useful for verifying that a file was copied without modification, that a translation round-trip preserved the original, or that a data migration produced the expected output.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions about text diff checkers, the LCS algorithm, split vs unified views, and comparing code and documents online

Common questions about how text diffing works, what the colour coding means, performance limits, and privacy
What is a text diff checker and how does it work?
A text diff checker is a tool that compares two pieces of text and highlights exactly what changed between them -- which lines were added, which were removed, and which remained identical. This tool uses the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) algorithm, the same approach used by the Unix diff command and Git version control. LCS finds the largest set of lines that appear in the same relative order in both texts. Lines not in that common set are classified as either added (present only in the right/modified text) or removed (present only in the left/original text). The result is the minimal set of changes needed to transform one text into the other, displayed with colour-coded highlighting.
What is the LCS algorithm and why is it used for text comparison?
The Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) algorithm solves the problem of finding the longest sequence of elements that appear in the same order in both input sequences -- without requiring the elements to be contiguous. For text diffing, the elements are lines of text. LCS is preferred over simpler character-by-character comparison because it produces semantically meaningful diffs: it correctly identifies blocks of unchanged lines even when surrounding content has shifted due to insertions or deletions elsewhere. The classic Unix diff tool, GNU diff, and Git's diff engine all use variants of LCS with optimisations for large files. This browser-based implementation uses a dynamic programming approach with an O(n*m) space complexity, which works efficiently for typical document and code comparison tasks.
What is the difference between unified view and split view in a diff checker?
Unified view (also called inline view) displays both the original and modified text in a single vertical stream. Removed lines (marked with a red minus prefix) and added lines (marked with a green plus prefix) appear interleaved, showing the context of each change in sequence. This is the format used by git diff in the terminal and is most efficient for reading when changes are sparse and spread throughout a long document. Split view (also called side-by-side view) displays the original text in the left column and the modified text in the right column simultaneously. Removed lines appear only in the left column and added lines only in the right column, making it visually easy to compare corresponding sections. Split view is better for understanding what replaced what when blocks of text have been rewritten.
Can I use this text diff tool to compare code files?
Yes -- this diff checker is well suited for comparing any plain text content including source code in any programming language, configuration files (JSON, YAML, TOML, .env), SQL scripts, shell scripts, Markdown documents, HTML/CSS, and any other text-based format. The comparison is line-level, meaning it identifies which lines changed rather than which individual characters within a line changed. This mirrors how developers use git diff during code review. For most code comparison tasks, line-level diff is sufficient to understand what was added, removed, or modified between two versions. The dark-themed monospace output panel uses JetBrains Mono font for clear code readability.
Is my text sent to a server when I use this diff checker?
No -- all text comparison processing runs entirely within your browser using JavaScript. When you click Compare, the LCS algorithm executes locally on your device and the results are rendered directly in the page. No text content is transmitted to any server, logged, or stored anywhere. This makes the tool safe to use with sensitive content such as internal documents, proprietary source code, confidential contracts, personal data, and anything else you would not want to send to a third-party service. The tool has no backend infrastructure -- it is a pure client-side React component. You can verify this by checking your browser's network tab while running a comparison: no outbound requests are made.
How do I compare two versions of a document for changes?
To compare two document versions, paste your original text into the left textarea labelled 'Original' and paste the revised version into the right textarea labelled 'Modified'. Click the Compare button to run the diff analysis. The tool will display added lines highlighted in green with a plus prefix, removed lines in red with a minus prefix, and unchanged lines in the default dark theme. Use the Unified View for a scrollable single-column output or Split View to see both versions side by side. The stats bar shows a summary count of added, removed, and unchanged lines. For documents pasted from word processors, ensure any special formatting or smart quotes are preserved as plain text -- the diff comparison is purely text-based and does not interpret rich text formatting.
Can I use this diff tool to check for plagiarism or content copying?
This text diff checker can help identify whether one document contains copied or paraphrased content from another by showing the percentage of unchanged lines between them. If you paste two texts and the diff shows a high number of equal (unchanged) lines, that indicates significant overlap. However, it is not a plagiarism detection tool in the traditional sense -- it does not search the web for matching content, does not handle paraphrasing (where words are changed but meaning is preserved), and does not work across multiple documents simultaneously. For academic plagiarism detection, dedicated tools like Turnitin or Copyscape are more appropriate. This tool is best used for comparing two specific known texts -- for example, checking whether a contractor's deliverable matches a prior work, or verifying that a republished article matches your original.
What types of text content work best with a line-by-line diff checker?
Line-by-line diff works best for content with meaningful line boundaries: source code (where each statement typically occupies one line), configuration files, CSV data, lists of items, legal contracts and formal documents with clause-per-line structure, Markdown files, email templates, and shell scripts. It is less effective for dense prose paragraphs where a single sentence might span multiple lines or where a small change in a word forces the entire paragraph to reflow across different line breaks -- in those cases, most unchanged text may appear as removed and added because the line boundaries shifted. For prose comparison, reformatting both inputs to have one sentence per line before comparing produces much cleaner and more readable diff output.
How do I interpret the diff stats -- added, removed, and unchanged counts?
The stats bar displayed after running a comparison shows three counts. Added (green) is the number of lines present in the right/modified text but not in the left/original -- these are new lines inserted into the document. Removed (red) is the number of lines present in the left/original text but not in the right/modified -- these are lines that were deleted. Unchanged (purple) is the number of lines identical in both texts -- these form the common backbone identified by the LCS algorithm. Note that a single edit that rewrites a line produces one removed count and one added count, not an in-place modification, because the diff operates at the line level. To calculate the overall change percentage: divide (added + removed) by (added + removed + unchanged) and multiply by 100.
What is the maximum text size this diff tool can handle?
This browser-based diff tool uses a dynamic programming LCS implementation with O(n*m) time and space complexity, where n and m are the line counts of the two input texts. In practice this means: very small texts (under 500 lines each) produce results instantaneously, medium texts (500-2000 lines) run in under a second on modern devices, and large texts (2000-5000 lines each) may take 2-5 seconds. For very large files above 5000 lines, the browser tab may become slow or unresponsive during computation. If you need to diff large files, consider splitting them into smaller sections and comparing segment by segment, or using a desktop diff tool like VS Code's built-in diff editor, Meld, or Beyond Compare which are optimised for large file comparison with memory-efficient diff algorithms.

Need a disposable email address?Stop giving your real email to sites you don't trust -- get a free instant throwaway with no signup and no trace.

Get Free Temp Mail ->